Would a requirement that candidates for federal office pass an objective test of basic constitutional law be considered an unconstitutional infringement on their right of free speech? Because there seems to be an unmet need for that kind of knowledge in this crop of primary candidates.
How about extensive background checks for politicians, prohibiting those whose recent pasts suggest any semblence of Progressivism? How else would liberty be defended? How else would the Oath of Office have any meaning?
Of course that would rule out something on the order of 97% to 99% of Republicans as well.
May 7th, 2019 at 5:36 pm
At this point, they’re not even thinking about winning the nomination. They’re working at polling high enough to make it to the debate stage.
May 8th, 2019 at 10:07 am
He was a piss-poor mayor and now is a piss-poor senator. So now NJ has a senator that likes little girls and this looser. NJ never learns.
May 8th, 2019 at 1:44 pm
Would a requirement that candidates for federal office pass an objective test of basic constitutional law be considered an unconstitutional infringement on their right of free speech? Because there seems to be an unmet need for that kind of knowledge in this crop of primary candidates.
May 9th, 2019 at 4:23 pm
How about extensive background checks for politicians, prohibiting those whose recent pasts suggest any semblence of Progressivism? How else would liberty be defended? How else would the Oath of Office have any meaning?
Of course that would rule out something on the order of 97% to 99% of Republicans as well.