Just compensation
So, the administration told everyone to destroy their bump stocks. Well, the manufacturers did. Then sued to be reimbursed for their loss. A federal judge said no.
So, the administration told everyone to destroy their bump stocks. Well, the manufacturers did. Then sued to be reimbursed for their loss. A federal judge said no.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
October 31st, 2019 at 8:44 pm
But muh 4D chess!
November 1st, 2019 at 8:23 am
I’ve never owned a bumpstock or been much interested in them, but this judge got his law degree out of a box of Cracker Jack.
November 3rd, 2019 at 10:22 am
“I’ve never owned a bumpstock or been much interested in them, but this judge got his law degree out of a box of Cracker Jack.”
– the judge unfortunately is right according to precedence. All the government has to do to get around the takings clause is ban something. There is a reason that the constitution doesn’t say the federal government has power to ban things. You can thank the drug war for these precedents.