More non-existent liberal bias in the Republican controlled media conglomerate
Ravenwood quotes Phillip Van Cleave:
As Sarah Brady spoke the TV cameras were rolling. As soon as she and the anti’s gave their side, the news cameras packed up and left. The opponents (pro-gun) then spoke to the committee.
March 18th, 2004 at 12:33 pm
Kind of the reverse of what happened in the lead-up to the Iraq war, eh? 🙂
March 18th, 2004 at 12:54 pm
On what planet? I seem to recall the anti-war crowd getting a ton of press for their protests where like 10 people show up.
March 18th, 2004 at 5:32 pm
How many times, in the lead-up to the Iraq war, was any prominent member of the Bush Administration asked what you would consider a “tough question?” It rarely happened, and even when those questions were asked, they were avoided, and nobody bothered to follow-up. Only after the fact was it okay somehow for the press to criticize the administration’s march to war.
March 18th, 2004 at 7:49 pm
Oh Gee, What liberal Media Bias…..
Like Susan Lindauer is related to a Bush staffer,
– but no mention of the fact that she is was a long time Democratic aide, peace activist, and considered a nut by her neighbors. http://maat.typepad.com/blog/2004/03/susan_lindauer_.html
Like 5.6% unemployment was OK under Clinton, but 5.6% unemployment is terrible under Bush. http://timblair.spleenville.com/archives/006086.php
Like a interview I heard on NPR last week that constantly referred to a possible Kerry administration, and always called it a Bush regime.
Close your eyes and stick a pin in the headline of any major newspaper, and you get media bias.
No question.
March 18th, 2004 at 11:24 pm
Sorry, bjbarron, but those aren’t signs of a liberal media; those are signs of a shitty media.