UC Davis: A study of firearm homicide and suicide rates in the 10 years after California simultaneously mandated comprehensive background checks for nearly all firearm sales and a prohibition on gun purchase and possession for persons convicted of most violent misdemeanor crimes found no change in the rates of either cause of death from firearms […]

Anti-gun shill Wintemute is at it again. Only, this time he refutes his own conclusion.

Excellent. And nothing happened. I mean, Wintemute still clings bitterly to his gun control fantasies. But that’s normal.

Careful if you’re asked to fill one out. Anti-gun hack Wintemute at it again. NSSF has the survey.

Garen Wintemute is at it again, cherry picking data to imply gun owners are drunkards. Ok, then. Shilling of Wintemute past.

Anti-gun shill Garen J. Wintemute (and others): Federal law makes no distinction between sales occurring at gun shows and other sales; there is no such thing as a gun show loophole. Been saying that for years.

Anti-gun shill Garen J. Wintemute: In fact, there is no gun-show loophole as such. Federal law is silent on the issue of gun shows and permits private-party gun sales to occur anywhere. Been saying that for years.

Anti-gun shill Garen Wintemute has another “study” that says guns are bad, mmmkay. Unlike last time, it looks as though he may have actually done some math instead of walking around a gun show and writing down things he thought looked illegal.

Anti-gun hack Garen Wintemute has done another study on gun shows and concluded the same thing he did last time. And, apparently, used the same methodology of going to gun shows and deciding all by his own self if something he saw looked legal or not.

You remember Wintemute? He’s the guy who walked around a gun show, completely unfamiliar with gun laws, and opined that he thought he saw some illegal stuff. And that was considered a study. Seriously. He was supposedly checking out anonymous, undocumented gun sale, which would be mostly impossible to do. Anyhoo, he’s back. His piece […]

Remember the confiscation in Cali I mentioned yesterday? Guess who’s helping decide what’s illegal? Wintemute. You know, the guy who did an alleged study (peddled by the likes of The Tennessean) in which he walked around a gun store and opined as to what he thought was illegal.

It’s true. Peruse my archives. Anyway, their latest starts with the phrase Our View and at the Tennessean Our View and guns means they support gun control. So, let’s count, once again, the inaccuracies: Loophole creates easy venue for criminals to lock, load What loophole? Sales at gun shows are subject to the exact same […]

You notice how the Joyce Foundation Funded astroturf blogs never have comments nor do they want any input? That same lesson The Brady Camp learned? Turns out, they don’t want feedback in real life either: Preventing gun crimes will be the focus of a summit Monday that is expected to draw dozens of police officers […]

I just listed some, but here’s another: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives no longer routinely checks the addresses of some buyers at gun shows after being accused of slowing sales at a show in Richmond in 2005, the Justice Department reported yesterday. And your tax dollars at work: The U.S. attorney’s office […]