First /20~ p@\/1 and now ƒ£µ0r1Ð3
Not only do worshipers of /20~ p@\/1 infest your comments when you mention his name. So do ƒ£µ0r1Ð3 detractors. See here. Comments from folks who I don’t recognize as regulars telling me how wrong I am.
14 Responses to “First /20~ p@\/1 and now ƒ£µ0r1Ð3”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
January 18th, 2008 at 11:05 pm
What you need is distilled rainwater and pure grain alcohol. Best not to contaminate your precious bodily fluids.
January 18th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
I can’t even figure out how they found your post so fast. I did a search for ƒ£µ0r1Ð3 (not spelled like that, obviously), and couldn’t find your blog at all.
January 18th, 2008 at 11:21 pm
When you are a little kid, and your teeth are still growing and have not yet erupted, you betcha you need fluoride in your water. Teeth are made of hydroxyapatite, which is a fluoriferous mineral. After you’ve gotten your second set of teeth, fluoride in the water won’t help you one bit, but topical fluoride might help you keep yer toofies longer.
Fluoride in the water is prolly good for kids, but gives no benefits to grown-ups. I dunno if it’s harmful to grownups or not.
January 19th, 2008 at 1:52 am
Do those IP addresses resolve to the Chicago Sun-Times by any chance? Didn’t you just say something about not hearing a peep out of Laura Washington for some time? I’m having a hard time believing that there actually is a anti-fluoride army out there ready to pounce the moment someone posts a bit of pro-fluorinated propaganda.
Perhaps you should try doing a blog post on Lyndon LaRouche? See what happens?
January 19th, 2008 at 7:53 am
My body essences are safe from communist infiltration, are yours? Are these people serious? I personally suspect that you are already on somebody’s radar and this is just an attempt to mess with you. And no, I don’t understand it either, I never accused your enemies of being sane.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:39 am
you may be more widely read than you think! most folks just don’t have a lot to add to the technical gun posts. as far as fluoride goes, a little discussion on the actual facts, studies, etc. would be in order.
January 19th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
good point, johnx.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:01 pm
1. The good doctor is SPANKING the GOP field in Nv.(well…it’s early) Can’t explain the other Mitt-igating factor though. Must be the flouride in the water.
2. Couldn’t that jesus spring for the slide lock of the Beretta Cheeta
been less teeny and fussy to better accommodate field stripping in the dark?
Maybe a slightly more conic nose on the retainer groove, but I know better than to be the first one to chuck it up on the lathe.
3. If I wanted someone else’s choice of nasty crap in my drinking water I’d buy scotch. 😉
January 19th, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Don’t be a loser and bad mouth whisky.
That’s almost as foolish as your statements on Flouride.
January 19th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Heh.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
I wouldn’t call it an army, exactly; more of a pitchfork-and-torch wielding mob. Well, a rabble perhaps. Or…
January 20th, 2008 at 6:57 pm
If it’s not a big rabble, maybe it’s a ribble? Does tinfoil defeat flouriozedz?
January 22nd, 2008 at 11:24 pm
I think you have an army of Dr. Strangelove fans. Myself included.
January 22nd, 2008 at 11:25 pm
For the record, any time someone brings up fluoridation of water, I immediately think about the commie plot to pollute our bodily fluids.