With people like that trying to forward their cause, do we really even need to offer any form of a rebuttal?
The biggest problem I see with it, (beyond the obvious) is that he is apparently young, and more and more of our youth are being brainwashed into this exact same idiotic line of thinking.
Yet he still insists that blue states have a nominally higher level of thinking and education……
People don’t think past the ends of their own noses these days and automatically assume* everyone is like them. Therefore if they’re prone to violent tendencies, everyone else is as well, and shouldn’t have weaponry at their disposal.
Not surprisingly, ABC only posted anti-gun comments. I just glanced over them after the first 5 or 6 but that was enough. No rebuttals from pro-second ammendment people posted. Reasoned discourse right?
I did have to laugh at the comments about how the blue state libs are sooooo much smarter and better educated than us red staters, their own comments proved them liars and/or fools. Hateful ones to boot.
If anti-gun policies work so well, then why do shootings keep happenin’ in gun-free zones?? It seems that those who maintain these zones are at least accomplices of those who prey on unarmed victims–kept that way by rules and laws—enforced by guns, of course.
Cactus Jack-
Yes, that is just a list of that one individuals’ crazed meanderings. There were a few others on there that were almost as bad, by other antis.
After checking back in on him, he says he is a 6’4″ muscle bound police officer and can speak for the founding fathers.
This guy is a class act, and should be tested for his mental condition.
February 15th, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Cactus Jack-
Yes, that is just a list of that one individuals’ crazed meanderings. There were a few others on there that were almost as bad, by other antis.
Well, I never professed to be the brightest star in the sky, and I do sometimes miss the obvious.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:39 am
With people like that trying to forward their cause, do we really even need to offer any form of a rebuttal?
The biggest problem I see with it, (beyond the obvious) is that he is apparently young, and more and more of our youth are being brainwashed into this exact same idiotic line of thinking.
Yet he still insists that blue states have a nominally higher level of thinking and education……
February 15th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
People don’t think past the ends of their own noses these days and automatically assume* everyone is like them. Therefore if they’re prone to violent tendencies, everyone else is as well, and shouldn’t have weaponry at their disposal.
*i.e. have been instructed so
February 15th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Not surprisingly, ABC only posted anti-gun comments. I just glanced over them after the first 5 or 6 but that was enough. No rebuttals from pro-second ammendment people posted. Reasoned discourse right?
I did have to laugh at the comments about how the blue state libs are sooooo much smarter and better educated than us red staters, their own comments proved them liars and/or fools. Hateful ones to boot.
February 15th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
jack, those were just one person’s comments.
February 15th, 2008 at 2:50 pm
All these comments made by one person Uncle?
February 15th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
If anti-gun policies work so well, then why do shootings keep happenin’ in gun-free zones?? It seems that those who maintain these zones are at least accomplices of those who prey on unarmed victims–kept that way by rules and laws—enforced by guns, of course.
February 15th, 2008 at 5:20 pm
The funny ones are the ones equating rape/murder with owning firearms. As somehow owning a gun is akin to raping a women.
February 15th, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Cactus Jack-
Yes, that is just a list of that one individuals’ crazed meanderings. There were a few others on there that were almost as bad, by other antis.
After checking back in on him, he says he is a 6’4″ muscle bound police officer and can speak for the founding fathers.
This guy is a class act, and should be tested for his mental condition.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
Anyone notice the continual use of the term “LOL”? I thought only teenage girls and flamboyant homosexuals peppered their writings with LOLs.
February 16th, 2008 at 5:56 pm
James Says:
February 15th, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Cactus Jack-
Yes, that is just a list of that one individuals’ crazed meanderings. There were a few others on there that were almost as bad, by other antis.
Well, I never professed to be the brightest star in the sky, and I do sometimes miss the obvious.