SoCons bail
Looks like they won’t play in any reindeer games because of all the gay cooties.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
December 30th, 2010 at 11:58 am
Good, fuck em. I hate people who neglect thier own lives to try to control the lives of others. These people are trying so to eradicate the gheyness while thier kids go to bed without getting a kiss or hug from mommy or daddy. Priorities folks, gays aren’t going to jump out of your closet and put gayness all over your family. But you know what might happen? Some worthless fucks WILL try thier hardest to take away what is yours, be it rights or property. Fucking socail conservatives are going to fuck this up for all of us.
December 30th, 2010 at 12:09 pm
Well, we know what kind of conservatives they are then….totalitarian assholes who don’t believe what they say.
December 30th, 2010 at 12:16 pm
Instead of social conservatives, we should refer to them as waist up conservative.
December 30th, 2010 at 12:56 pm
Best thing that could happen to the GOP is for the social conservatives to slink back to the caves they crawled out of in the 80’s.
December 30th, 2010 at 1:22 pm
The reason they do this is that they have moral and religious beliefs that preclude what society tries to force them to accept… A slow retreat is not forcing anything on anyone. It is when you act on the offense then you are forcing… Which side is acting on the offense???
As for taking care of their children how do you know this to be accurate… Do you go to their houses at night and watch???
December 30th, 2010 at 1:34 pm
Having a mom who was a local crusader for “teh children” I know what these folks will do to thier children to protect EVERYONES children.
December 30th, 2010 at 2:09 pm
Unfortunately, their moral and religious beliefs preclude them leaving me the frak alone. It’s good to see them go – hopefully they won’t come back and will fade into irrelevance.
December 30th, 2010 at 4:00 pm
Jake that sounds exactly like what the anti-gunners said about gunners in the late 60’s…. If you use the same tactics as the enemy to beat your enemy you become the enemy…. You know hateful and intolerant… You cannot say I am persecuted but be the aggressor… If your enemies are retreating as you move forward that is not a sign of their aggression…It is a sign on yours. Defeating an enemy who believes they are right is impossible unless you kill them all…
December 30th, 2010 at 4:09 pm
They are welcome to go form a euro-style Christian Socialist party.
They would be happier there.
December 30th, 2010 at 4:31 pm
Social “live and let livers” aren’t being aggressive about anything but their ignoring of the above the waist conservatives.
December 30th, 2010 at 7:23 pm
Good. I wish more conservatives would stand up to this radical liberal front group. Unfortunate how many ‘conservatives’ buy into this sort of liberal crap.
December 31st, 2010 at 12:06 am
I would have had some rather stronger words for Ryan Sorba, myself. Words such as “homophobe,” or “bigot.” Maybe some rotten fruit would have been involved, I dunno.
California Young Americans for Freedom, indeed.
December 31st, 2010 at 3:06 am
So Uncle do you condemn all Catholics as well? Homosexuality is a lifestyle choice: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation
Because we don’t choose to support it we are somehow in the wrong? You don’t have to promote it to be socially accepted, better to provide a good moral example.
I’m glad there’s some accountability politically.
December 31st, 2010 at 10:23 am
Why would i condemn catholics? it’s their clubhouse, do what they want. But keep it out of my .gov.
Anyone who thinks homosexuality is a choice is ignorant.
December 31st, 2010 at 9:00 pm
Yea, the CPAC meeting is just another clubhouse too and it seems like the pro-gay group is trying to legislate acceptance of their lifestyle choice in the .gov, i.e. DADT etc. Additionally your condemning those who oppose that, of which Catholics do not support that lifestyle choice. It doesn’t even matter to the argument whether it’s a choice or not anyway, though there is no biologically evidence to support the genetic cause for that behavior, but why promote it?