Mo’ bigotry
Bill, the bigot I mentioned earlier, apparently took to googling his name and decided to leave a comment that makes no sense.
14 Responses to “Mo’ bigotry”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
May 18th, 2012 at 12:49 pm
Bill has “issues.”
May 18th, 2012 at 1:11 pm
Trayvon labled the bad guy? He has got to be fucking kidding.
The media chose to use pics of Trayvon when he was 13 while calling Zimmerman a “white hispanic”.
He is nuckin’ futts!
May 18th, 2012 at 1:19 pm
Sure it makes sense: “I don’t feel the need to carry a gun, so you, you small-dicked coward, cannot. Because I say so.”
May 18th, 2012 at 1:23 pm
Imaginary vietnam service syndrome. It’s a pity to see it in public.
May 18th, 2012 at 1:33 pm
I also love that he pens an editorial about how all the threats that CCW’s worry about are imaginary.
And then in response to mockery of his editorial, he screams about his own fears of being in a crossfire between a CCW carrier and a bad guy.
You see his fears about voilence are legitimate and require legislation, restriction of rights, and the force of the state.
May 18th, 2012 at 2:08 pm
Piss on that effete sack of shit. His words have no iron.
May 18th, 2012 at 5:07 pm
Unc, ladies and gentlemen, it didn’t happen like that. I’m a regular reader and commenter at this blog. I was visiting the site and read the original post, then followed the link to the letter to the editor. I recognized the writer as my older brother. I told a sister about it; she mentioned it to him. He asked me for a link to the original post at this blog, which I provided. He chose to comment, and Unc chose to reply, as did quite a few others. Sorry for the kerfuffle, if that’s what it was.
And yes, he did serve in the Army as he stated. I can’t speak to the particulars of what he did while in Vietnam, I was a kid at the time. He was an officer in heavy artillery, then trained as a helicopter pilot, then flew Hueys, IIRC.
I could say a lot more, but I won’t. I find the whole experience rather funny, and an example of how small the Web/the world can be at times.
May 18th, 2012 at 5:18 pm
Swedish K, it’s new version of that ‘O so popular diet breakfast cerial, but, with meatballs.
May 18th, 2012 at 5:25 pm
And by the way, the “Swedish K” is the Carl Gustav M/45 SMG. It is indeed sometimes called the Swedish K, short for Kulsprutepistol m/45.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Gustav_M45
I’ve never shot one, or even seen one. I do have a thing for Swedish Mausers, though, I own several. 😉
May 18th, 2012 at 5:27 pm
Darrell, that is awesome. The internet makes the world smaller
May 18th, 2012 at 5:36 pm
Thanks, Unc.
I forgot to mention, US forces DID use the Swedish K in ‘Nam, too (read down in the wiki article). Did my brother? I don’t know.
May 18th, 2012 at 7:26 pm
I just want to say that someone who supposedly fought for freedom overseas might want to step back and think about what the word means. I understand that just because someone is in the military doesn’t mean that they understand and embrace the meaning of the American Founding Principles– many were drafted at a young age. Being as we’re decades past that war, there’s been plenty of time to think about it though. What was America fighting for? Trying to stop the spread of communist aggression, why? For advocates of liberty it’s not a terribly difficult question.
For everyone else, I suppose it’s; “One, two, three, what’re we fightin’ for. Don’t ask me I don’t give a damn…” And those will be the same people impugning our constitutional rights at home.
May 19th, 2012 at 2:50 pm
The bull is stacked higher and higher…
May 21st, 2012 at 4:30 pm
Mortars aren’t guns.