Gun Trace Data
All that data that Bloomberg and Helmke say cops don’t have access to but they should. Well, turns out the ATF does give the data. But don’t take my word for it, since I’ve said it a lot. Take the word of ATF Director Michael Sullivan, who says:
“During the past several weeks, numerous questions and articles have arisen in the media, regarding the ability of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to share firearms trace data among members of the law-enforcement community. With the recent tragic events surrounding the senseless criminal use of firearms; I felt the need to clarify this important issue.
…….
Our agency routinely shares trace data with state and local law-enforcement agencies in support of investigations within their respective jurisdictions. Once a requesting agency receives law-enforcement-sensitive trace data from ATF, it becomes the agency’s data to disseminate and share with other law-enforcement entities as it deems appropriate.Let me be clear: neither the congressional language nor ATF rules prohibit the sharing of trace data with law enforcement conducting criminal investigations, or place any restrictions on the sharing of trace data with other jurisdictions once it is in the hands of state or local law enforcement.
Now, will Bloomberg and Helmke admit the real change they want? Which is to get unfettered access to the data in support of civil suits against gun makers, even though said suits are illegal.
May 3rd, 2007 at 11:33 am
In what sense are such suits illegal?
May 3rd, 2007 at 11:54 am
The protection of lawful arms in commerce act.
May 3rd, 2007 at 3:00 pm
Ah, you triggered the part of my brain that engages in legalistic nit-picking.
I would probably say such suits are unlikely to succeed.
If I were going out on a limb, I *might* go so far as to say such suits have the potential to be frivolous. Still, I could probably come up with ways to draft a non-frivolous complaint on the matter, so I don’t think I would go out on that limb without at least seeing the complaint.
The suit itself, though, isn’t prohibited by law, so saying it’s illegal is too strong language for my tastes.
May 3rd, 2007 at 3:10 pm
Ah, could be. But i’m no lawyer.
May 3rd, 2007 at 4:30 pm
They also need that trace data so they can shame Pennsylvania legislatures into passing one-gun-a-month “See! See! Your state is supplying all the crime guns to New Jersey and New York!”.
June 13th, 2007 at 11:26 am
[…] from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Ownership. The Tiahrt amendment is supported by the ATF and the […]